Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. Fulop

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 27, 1985No. D8204-68360, D8301-60009 CA A31740 (Control), CA A32166Published

1DissentRossman, J.

It is neither legally right nor is it fair that these respondents should be deprived of their attorney fees.

We are dealing with two filiation cases, which have been consolidated for appeal. Respondents successfully defended charges of paternity. Both asked for attorney fees in their answers and received them from the trial court. It is undisputed that both were entitled, as a substantive matter, to the awards. However, the state claims that the right to recover attorney fees was pleaded improperly, in that no statute providing a basis for such fees was alleged, as required by *426ORCP 68C(2). The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Talent Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Lake Oswego Review, Inc. v. SteinkampOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Cascade Warehouse Co. v. DyerOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Parkhurst v. FaesslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Diamond Claims & Inves., Inc. v. GrenskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API