Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Talent Irrigation District

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1977No. 75 2662 E 3, SC 24740PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, C. J.

Plaintiffs filed this action in both trespass and negligence asserting that they had suffered damage as a result of the entry of water onto their property caused by defendant’s irrigation ditch. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs on the negligence issues only. Plaintiffs recovered general damages for mental anguish and special damages. Defendant appealed.

Defendant asserts that the trial court erred in refusing to strike plaintiffs’ claim for damages for mental anguish. Defendant’s position upon appeal is that recovery for mental anguish cannot be had in a negligence action…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacCa v. General Telephone Co. of Northwest, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. McGrath v. White Motor CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Phillips Ranch, Inc. v. BantaOregon Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. City of Tyler v. LikesTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Norwest v. Presbyterian Intercommunity HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Nearing v. WeaverOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Maloney v. Home and Investment Center, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Branch v. Western Petroleum, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API