Legal Opinion

Kling v. City of Austin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 26, 1933No. 7831PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLENDON, Chief Justice.

This is a damage suit against the city of Austin for injuries to person and property caused by appellant’s automobile running onto a “fire plug and hydrant” on Fourteenth street in that city. The appeal is from a judgment in favor of the city upon a verdict, directed, upon the city’s motion, at the close of appellant’s evidence.

The two-year statute of limitations (Rev. St. 1925, art. 5526) is urged, predicated upon the proposition that a trial amendment to the amended petition, upon which the cause was tried (filed more than two years after the cause of action arose),…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Love v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. City Council of Augusta v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  3. McFarland v. City of McCaysvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. Barnes v. City of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Adkinson v. City of Port ArthurCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. DanielsTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. City of Port Arthur v. WallaceTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Crow v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Ford v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Palmer v. City of BenbrookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API