Legal Opinion
Sterling Mirror of Maryland, Inc. v. Gordon
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 1993No. 90-CV-431PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAGNER, Associate Judge:
Appellant, Sterling Mirror of Maryland, Inc. (Sterling), appeals from a judgment awarding appellee, Daisy Gordon (appel-lee), $1,000 in damages on her counterclaim which alleged that Sterling harassed her by telephone while attempting to collect the balance due on Sterling’s contract with her husband, John Gordon, for the installation of mirrors at the Gordons’ home. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in finding it liable because the facts do not support a claim under the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692a-1692k (1982) (Debt…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Waldon v. CovingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Mary Crossley v. Arnold R. LiebermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Bown v. HamiltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Saunders v. NematiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Homan v. GoyalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Murray v. Wells Fargo Home MortgageDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Witherspoon v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Wood v. NeumanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Mazza v. Verizon Washington, Dc, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.