City of Dallas v. Hopkins
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
The main question involved in this appeal is the right of the city of Dallas to be sued in the county of its domicile, Dallas county: George M. Hopkins filed suit in the district court of Denton county against the city of Dallas, Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Company, and the W. E. Callahan Construction Company, alleging that the defendants, acting jointly and severally, constructed a dam across Elm fork of the Trinity river, near Garza, below which plaintiff owned some lands; that plaintiff’s land, which was alleged to be rich and fertile, producing theretofore large crops, was made subject…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mayor of Nashville v. WebbTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
- Phillips v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- City of Tahoka v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1925
- Ireton v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
- Cobb v. H. C. Burt & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rasberry v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- City of Corpus Christi v. McMurreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Powell v. Eastern Carolina Regional Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- City of Corpus Christi v. CoffinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- City of Stamford v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960