Legal Opinion

City of Stamford v. Ballard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 11, 1960No. 3561PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

J. R. Ballard and others, who own and operate fishing camps and rent boats in Haskell County adjacent to Lake Stamford, which lake is a part of the City of Stamford, sued the city and its “lake officer”, McDaniel, in Haskell County. Plaintiffs -sought to have a penal ordinance levying an inspection fee on rent boats used on said lake held invalid and its enforcement enjoined. They alleged the city had enacted ■Ordinance 364 authorizing the city, through McDaniel, to collect $18 per boat from all owners of rent boats used on said lake as an annual inspection fee; that plaintiffs •owned fifty…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Compton v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Stockyards National Bank v. MaplesTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Ladner v. Reliance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Bielecki v. City of Port ArthurTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  5. Moreland v. LeslieTexas Supreme Court · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McGough v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1989
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1962
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API