Legal Opinion

Lashus v. Chamberlain

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe district court of tbe first district and from an order overruling a motion for a new trial. Tbe opinion states tbe facts.

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

Tbis is an action for damages for breach of contract, whereby tbe defendant, in making a sale to plaintiff of a hotel in Ogden, known as tbe “Chamberlain House,” agreed with tbe defendant not to engage in tbe hotel business again in Ogden as long as tbe plaintiff continued as proprietor of tbe Chamberlain House under that name and style; which contract, it is alleged, tbe defendant violated by opening another hotel, within a short time, in *386close proximity to the Chamberlain House, and directing-custom and patronage therefrom to the hotel kept by himself. The cause was tried to a jury, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Doyle v. DixonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  3. Lawrence v. BarkerNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Roberts v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  5. Burrell v. New York & Saginaw Solar Salt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1865

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cosfriff Bros. v. MillerWyoming Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Henry's Drive-In, Inc. v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  3. Dose v. ToozeOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Schultz v. Mexican Dam & Ditch Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API