Legal Opinion

ANDREW HILL ESTATE AND JANET HILL ESTATE v. THE CHEMOURS COMPANY

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 13, 2025No. 1:24-cv-07172Unknown

1Opinion

[Docket No. 7] IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE ANDREW HILL on behalf of THE ESTATES OF ANDREW HILL and JANET HILL, Civil Action No. 24-7172 Plaintiff, (RMB/SAK) v. OPINION THE CHEMOURS COMPANY, Defendant. APPEARANCES Andrew W. Hill 20 N. Golfwood Avenue Carney’s Point, New Jersey 08069 Pro Se Plaintiff as legal representative of the Estates of Andrew Hill and Janet Hill David Andrew Schlier, Esq. MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP 405 N. King Street, Suite 8th Floor Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Ryan A. Richman, Esq. Lanny Steven Kurzweil, Esq. MCCARTER &…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API