Legal Opinion

Louisville Trust Co. v. Heimbuecher

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 14, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Count by

Chief Justice Bees

Affirming.

The appellant, the Louisville Trust Company, on December 1, 1931, brought this suit against the appellee Lula Mae Heimbuecher, and her husband, William C. Heimbuecher, upon a promissory note on which it claimed there was a balance due of $2,100. The note, dated September 2, 1930, was for $2,200 and was payable 90 days after date with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from maturity. It was credited with a payment of $100 as of November 30, 1931. On December 7, 1931, the plaintiff filed an amended and supplemental petition…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Vaughan's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Miller v. Tarter, JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. GreenDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
  2. Louisville & N. R. v. Paul's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  3. Castle v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  4. Louisville & N. R. v. Paul's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API