Sandusky Foundry & Machine Co. v. De Lavaud
District Court, N.D. Ohio
In Equity. Suit by the Sandusky Foundry & Machine Company, a corporation, against D. Sendaud De Favaud and others. On motion, to dismiss.
1Opinion of the Court
WESTENHAVER, District Judge.
Defendants, D. Sendaud De Favaud and Fernando Arens, Jr., move to dismiss complainant's bill for want of jurisdiction, on the ground that they are not inhabitants of this district, that they did not infringe, and have no established place of business therein.
Complainant’s bill was filed September 13, 1916. It alleges that the defendant corporation is organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the republic of Brazil, and that the two individual defendants are citizens and residents of that republic. All three defendants are jointly charged with…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Barrow Steamship Co. v. KaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Kreigh v. Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brunette MacHine Works, Ltd. v. Kockum Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. WoelfleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Japan Gas Lighter Association v. Ronson Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1966
- Oil & Gas Ventures-First 1958 Fund, Ltd. v. KungDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Gulf Smokeless Coal Co. v. Sutton, Steele & Steele.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.