In RE ESTATE OF BECK v. Campbell
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFaulconer, J.
This appeal is from a judgment entered on a verdict returned for the appellee who had filed a claim against the appellant estate for alleged services rendered to appellant’s decedent by appellee. The overruling of appellant’s motion for new trial is the sole assignment of error. In its brief appellant divides its argument under headings designated I through X inclusive and in this opinion we shall discuss them accordingly.
I and IXa and X
We here will discuss those specifications that the verdict of the jury was not sustained by sufficient evidence and contrary to law and the refusal of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. WilerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. HeadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927
- Indiana Union Traction Co. v. ThomasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
- Baker v. WhittakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
- Hartzell v. HartzellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Snodgrass v. BaizeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Riverside Insurance v. PedigoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Campbell v. City of MishawakaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Martin v. RinckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. JaggersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.