State v. Jaggers
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CONOVER, Presiding Judge.
In this interlocutory appeal, Plaintiff-Appellant State of Indiana and Medical Licensing Board of Indiana (State) appeals the denial of its motion to compel discovery of the names, addresses, and phone numbers of Defendant-Appellee Lawrence Jag-gers's (Jaggers) patients who have been treated by acupuncture.
We affirm.
ISSUES
The State presents one issue, namely, whether a chiropractor may assert the physician-patient privilege, IND.CODE 84-1-14-5(4), to preclude discovery by the State of the names, addresses and telephone numbers of his patients who have been treated by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. WilerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Collins v. BairIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Colman v. HeidenreichIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Summerlin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
- Pennsylvania Co. v. MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Terre Haute Regional Hospital, Inc. v. TruebloodIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Terre Haute Regional Hospital, Inc. v. TruebloodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Terre Haute Regional Hospital, Inc. v. TruebloodIndiana Supreme Court · 1992