Legal Opinion

Libbett v. Roseburg Forest Products

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 7, 1994No. 90-21849; CA A81988PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

Claimant has a compensable leg injury. The referee determined that claimant is permanently and totally disabled. The Board reversed the referee, holding that claimant had failed to meet her burden of proof. The only question on review is whether the Board erred in relying on surveillance tapes in evaluating claimant’s disability and in finding that claimant had riot accurately depicted her physical limitations at the hearing or to the doctors who had evaluated the extent of her disability.

ORS 656.245(3)(b)(B) provides, in part:

“Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, only the attending…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Koitzsch v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Agripac, Inc. v. BeemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Atkins v. Allied Systems, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API