Gastonia Personnel Corp. v. Rogers
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtMoRRis, J.
This appeal presents but one question: that is, whether the employment of the services of a professional employment agency may be considered a “necessary” expense so that an infant is obligated to pay for them.
The general rule is that a minor may disaffirm a contract made by him. The exception to this rule is that a minor is obligated to pay for necessaries. Turner v. Gaither, 83 N.C. 357; and In Re Peacock, 261 N.C. 749, 136 S.E. 2d 91.
What are necessaries?
“In Freeman v. Bridger, 49 N.C., 1, Pearson, J., speaking to the subject: ‘Lord Coke says, Co. Lit., 172a, “It is agreed by all the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re PeacockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Turner v. . GaitherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- Fisher Ex Rel. Fisher v. Taylor Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Freeman v. . BridgerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1856
- Barger v. M. & J. Finance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.