Legal Opinion

Gastonia Personnel Corp. v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 29, 1969No. 6927DC225Published

1Opinion of the CourtMoRRis, J.

This appeal presents but one question: that is, whether the employment of the services of a professional employment agency may be considered a “necessary” expense so that an infant is obligated to pay for them.

The general rule is that a minor may disaffirm a contract made by him. The exception to this rule is that a minor is obligated to pay for necessaries. Turner v. Gaither, 83 N.C. 357; and In Re Peacock, 261 N.C. 749, 136 S.E. 2d 91.

What are necessaries?

“In Freeman v. Bridger, 49 N.C., 1, Pearson, J., speaking to the subject: ‘Lord Coke says, Co. Lit., 172a, “It is agreed by all the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re PeacockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Turner v. . GaitherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  3. Fisher Ex Rel. Fisher v. Taylor Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Freeman v. . BridgerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1856
  5. Barger v. M. & J. Finance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API