Legal Opinion
Sloan v. People
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 30, 1904No. Gen. Nos. 11,367 & 11,428PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Contempt proceedings. Appeals from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Jesse Holdoji, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Windes
Mo question is' made as to the sufficiency of the bill to sustain nor as to the scope of the order of injunction.
Appellants claim that the court erred in entering a rule against them to show cause why they should not be attached and punished, as set out in the statement, but we are of opinion the petition, the substance of which is stated, being sworn to, was sufficient to justify the court in entering the rule. Oster v. The People, 192 Ill. 473-8.
It is also contended that the court erred in not allowing a motion made by appellants on the filing of their sworn answers, respectively, to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re LennonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Oster v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Christensen v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
- Parsons v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
3Cited by4 opinions
- Melbourne Corp. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Fansteel Metallurgical Corp. v. Lodge 66 of the Amalgamated Ass'n of Iron, Steel & Tin Workers of North AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
- People Ex Rel. Scott v. Master Barbers & Beauty Culturists Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- American Zinc Co. v. VeceraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949