Legal Opinion

People v. Warner

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided May 7, 2019No. C077711PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlease, Acting P. J.

*811*27This case involves a jury finding of attempted homicide pursuant to a "kill zone" theory. It arises from a shooting in a crowded bar. On a Saturday night of a long July 4th holiday weekend, defendant Shane Michael Warner took a semiautomatic hand gun, concealed in his waistband into a bar. He shot across the bar's semi-dark dance floor, illuminated by a strobe light, at I. Smith, who had attacked him a few weeks earlier. Defendant emptied the gun's clip of 10 bullets and wounded, but did not kill his primary target, Smith, and wounded, but did not kill an innocent bystander, N.C. Defendant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. YeomanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. People v. AshmusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. WindfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  2. People v. WindfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. People v. WindfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API