Faustre v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 8-INDICTMENT— APPEAL FROM KENTON CRIMINAL COURT. Brief not in record. The record from the office of the Inspector of Vital Statistics, certified to by the Consul of the United States for the District of Toronto and its dependencies, answers fully the requisition of the law. (Gen. Stats., chap. 37., sec. 15.)
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE LEWIS
delivered the opinion of the court.
The offense of which appellant was convicted is bigamy charged in the indictment to have been committed. *35as follows: “ The said Albert E. Eaustre, on the — day of September, 1891, * * and before the finding of this indictment, did feloniously and unlawfully marry Minnie Knight, he then and there having a wife then living by the name of Caroline L. Eaustre, to whom he, the said Albert E. Eaustre, was lawfully married on the 19th of September, 1891, at Niagara Ealls, in the Province of Ontario, Dominion of Canada, under the name of Albert E.…
2Cited by13 opinions
- People v. Le DouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Derinza's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- People v. PriestleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Cornett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. ChamosCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.