Legal Opinion

Whitney Realty Co. v. Secretary of State

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1922No. Calendar No. 30,258PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff is a partnership association organized under Act No. 191, Pub. Acts 1877, as amended (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 7950 et seq.). It is required by that act to make an, annual report to the secretary of State on a blank to be furnished by that officer. It requested a blank, was refused, and brought mandamus.

The defendant secretary of State contends:

“That section 13 of said Act No. 191 has been superseded by the provisions of Act No. 85 of the Public Acts of 1921, and more particularly by section 7 of the last mentioned act.
“That the said, plaintiff is a corporation within the meaning of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Union Steam Pump Sales Co. v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Union Trust Co. v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Staver & Abbott Manufacturing Co. v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Rouse, Hazard & Co. v. Detroit Cycle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Armstrong v. StearnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hodgkiss v. Northland Petroleum ConsolidatedMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Michigan Trust Co. v. HerpolsheimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Realty Co., Limited v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Attorney General v. Hill-Davis Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API