Legal Opinion
Whitney Realty Co. v. Secretary of State
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 2, 1922No. Calendar No. 30,258PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
Plaintiff is a partnership association organized under Act No. 191, Pub. Acts 1877, as amended (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 7950 et seq.). It is required by that act to make an, annual report to the secretary of State on a blank to be furnished by that officer. It requested a blank, was refused, and brought mandamus.
The defendant secretary of State contends:
“That section 13 of said Act No. 191 has been superseded by the provisions of Act No. 85 of the Public Acts of 1921, and more particularly by section 7 of the last mentioned act.
“That the said, plaintiff is a corporation within the meaning of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Union Steam Pump Sales Co. v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Union Trust Co. v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Staver & Abbott Manufacturing Co. v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Rouse, Hazard & Co. v. Detroit Cycle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Armstrong v. StearnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hodgkiss v. Northland Petroleum ConsolidatedMontana Supreme Court · 1937
- Michigan Trust Co. v. HerpolsheimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Realty Co., Limited v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Attorney General v. Hill-Davis Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932