Legal Opinion

People v. Huntsman

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1929No. Docket No. 1853PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HAHN, J., pro tem.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction upon an information filed by the district attorney of Los Angeles County, charging him with the crime of “possession of a still,” and from an order denying his motion for a new trial of the action. In urging a reversal of the judgment, appellant presents the following grounds:

1. That the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict.

2. Errors committed by the court in connection with certain rulings made during the trial.

3'. Errors committed by the court in the giving of certain instructions to the jury.

4. That Act 3795…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. People v. GuidoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gillespie v. BloodUtah Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API