Legal Opinion
Goggins v. Hoddes
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 5, 1970No. 5047PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant complained in the trial court that she was libelled when her employer filed an allegedly false report with the District Unemployment Compensation Board (hereinafter the Board) charging her with dishonesty in a deliberate attempt to cause her to lose unemployment benefits. The trial court granted the appellee-employer’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
Pursuant to the provisions of D.C.Code 1967, § 46—313(b) the Board promulgated certain rules and regulations. One of them, Employer Regulation VIII, B(l), requires that
[wjhenever a worker is separated from his employment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Simpson v. Oil Transfer CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1948
- Stafney v. Standard Oil Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
- Breuer v. Bo-Craft Enterprises, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957
3Cited by11 opinions
- McKethean v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- District of Columbia v. ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Elliott v. Healthcare Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Turner v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Haverly v. Kaytec, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.