Legal Opinion

Tyler v. Van Aelst

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 27, 1973No. 662-3PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.

— Plaintiffs brought this action seeking damages for injury to their water-diversion system and for a *442permanent injunction enjoining defendants from committing future or further damage to said system. Defendants answered, denying responsibility for any damage, and-cross-complained, seeking damages for injury to the property they operated under an easement. These damages were allegedly caused by the plaintiffs while trespassing on said property and as a result of installation of a pipeline across the property. Defendants also sought a mandatory injunction compelling the removal of plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Port of Seattle v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. King County v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Hunt v. PlavsaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hendricks v. LakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. Jeffrey K. Markoff v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. View Ridge Estates Hoa, Resps V. Walter Guetter, AppsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API