Legal Opinion

Clark v. Commercial Trust Co. of N.J.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 1, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The determination of the controversy here presented involves and is controlled by the proper construction of a trust deed dated February 16th, 1918, under which the late Senator Clark of Montana transferred to the Commercial Trust Company of New Jersey, as trustee, thirty thousand (subsequently increased to thirty-six thousand) shares of stock of the United Verde Copper Company for the benefit of his then infant daughter, Huguette, one of the present complainants, who on May 23d 1929, assigned an undivided one-half interest to her rights thereunder to her mother, Anna E. Clark, the other…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dana v. . FiedlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. City of Chicago v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Murray v. StantonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Stoll v. Almon C. Judd Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  5. McCracken v. GulickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. HellerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  2. Morristown Trust Co. v. ThebaudNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. Palisades Trust, C., Co. v. ProbstNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  4. American Bitumuls Co. v. Tribunal de Contribuciones de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1946
  5. American Bitumuls Co. v. Tax Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API