Legal Opinion

Amis v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided April 25, 1983No. 80-88 Civ-Ft.M-KPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KRENTZMAN, Senior District Judge.

This is an antitrust action brought under sections one and two of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2 (1976), and under the Florida Antitrust Act, Fla.Stat. Ch. 542 (1981), in which plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief under sections four and sixteen of the Clayton Act. 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 15,26 (Supp.1982). The complaint alleges certain conduct of several of the major banks and law firms in the Fort Myers, Florida area, and describes various theories under which this conduct assertedly violated the antitrust laws. Substantial discovery was conducted,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amey, Inc., and John C. Amis, Jr. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., Amey, Inc., and John C. Amis, Jr. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. White v. Mapco Gas Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1987
  3. Price v. City of Fort PierceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API