Legal Opinion

People v. Jackson

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 1993No. E009514PublishedCited by 21 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.

I

Defendants Conway, Robinson, and Jackson were each convicted by a jury of various attempted murder, kidnapping, burglary, attempted robbery, and assault offenses arising out of an attempted robbery of a check-cashing business, and a subsequent shoot-out with sheriff’s deputies.

On appeal, they each raise numerous trial and sentencing issues. We consider those issues in the sequence in which they arose at trial.

II, III *

IV Trial Issues

1. Shackling of Defendants During Trial.

All three defendants argue that the trial court abused its discretion and committed…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. People v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Deck v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. People v. Kopp, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. People v. MarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. FelixCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API