Legal Opinion
Morrison-Tiffin v. Hampton
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided January 3, 1995No. 9414SC12PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Judge.
Plaintiffs commenced this action for alleged violations of their constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, intentional infliction of emotional distress, civil conspiracy, and negligent hiring and retention. From entry of summary judgment for all defendants on all claims, plaintiffs appeal.
Plaintiff Charles Mark Tiffin (hereinafter “Tiffin”) began working as a Durham Police Officer in 1979. Plaintiff Susan Rose Morrison-Tiffin (hereinafter “Morrison-Tiffin”) began working as a Durham Police Officer in 1980. In 1982, Morrison-Tiffin resigned from the police department, but…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Paquette v. County of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Houpe v. City of StatesvilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- May v. City of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Radcliffe v. Avenel Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Anderson Ex Rel. Jerome v. Town of AndrewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.