Arredondo v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RANDY CRANE, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Now before the Court is Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance *365Company’s (“Hartford”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 35). Plaintiff Deborah Arredondo, individually and as executrix of the Estate of Danny Trevino, originally filed suit against Hartford and International Bank of Commerce (“IBC”)1 in the 93rd Judicial District Court, Hidalgo County, Texas, on February 25, 2011. (Doc. 1, Ex. A). Plaintiffs “Second Amended Petition,” the live pleading in this action, alleges that as early…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Turner v. Baylor Richardson Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.