In Re Crosby
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
Respondent Stanley B. Crosby, an attorney, was found guilty by a majority of The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of professional misconduct in that he on two occasions solicited business in violation of Canon 28 of the Canons of Professional Ethics, Supreme Court Rule 33. There was dissent on The Board from this finding. A majority of The Board has recommended that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law because of such misconduct.
The record amply supports the findings of The Board that respondent was guilty of the charges against him and we adopt…
2Cited by6 opinions
- In Re BloomSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Doe v. CondonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- In the Matter of BeattieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- In Re CravenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- In Re CravenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.