Legal Opinion
Ilo Eischeid Mary Eischeid v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 27, 1997No. 96-55342UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
116 F.3d 1485
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Ilo EISCHEID; Mary Eischeid, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (Amtrak), Defendant-Appellee.
No. 96-55342.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 4, 1997.
Decided June 27, 1997.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Brown v. Poway Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Frazier v. International Longshoremen's Union Local No. 10Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Emerick v. Raleigh Hills HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harris v. NATIONAL PASSENGER RR CORP.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1999