Legal Opinion

Saidock v. McClain

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 30, 2022No. 3:19-cv-01319Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DANIEL SAIDOCK, Plaintiff, No. 3:19-cv-1319 (SRU) v. TANESHA CARRINGTON-MCCLAIN, et al., Defendants. RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT On August 27, 2019, Daniel Saidock (“Saidock”), a now released state prisoner,1 brought a complaint pro se and in forma pauperis under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

against four Connecticut Department of Correction (“DOC”) employees: Nurse Tanesha Carrington-McClain (“Nurse Carrington-McClain or Tanesha”), Dr. Vicki Blumberg (“Dr. Blumberg”), Dr. Susannah Tung, and Dr. George L. Bozzi. See Compl., Doc No. 1, at 2.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API