Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Heinen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 2, 1930No. Gen. No. 34,024PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ryner

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order appointing a receiver, pendente lite, in a foreclosure proceeding pending in the circuit court of Cook county. The bill of complaint was not verified, except that it was accompanied by an affidavit in which it was stated, upon information and belief, that the owner of the equity of redemption, Theodore Heinen, was a resident of the City of Los Angeles, in the State of California. The receiver was appointed pursuant to the prayer of a petition sworn to by the complainant.,It was alleged in the petition that the complainant was the owner and holder…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bagley v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Bothman v. LindstromAppellate Court of Illinois · 1921
  3. Walenti v. KrolikAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924
  4. Chicago Title & Trust Co v. BickleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goodman v. HeinenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API