Goodman v. Heinen
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
Benedict K. Coodman filed his bill to foreclose the lien of a trust deed securing an indebtedness on which there was a balance due of $86,000. Two days thereaftef, on motion of complainant, a receiver was appointed. Twenty-nine days afterward some of the defendants appealed to this court, where the order was reversed. Goodman v. Heinen, 255 Ill. App. 395. Upon his appointment the receiver entered upon the discharge of his duties and collected the rents until the order was reversed, at which time he had $2,040.77 remaining in his hands. He filed his account and deposited the money with the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wolkenstein v. SlonimIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Ruprecht v. MuhlkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Ruprecht v. HenriciAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
- Central Trust Co. v. McGurnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
- Ruprecht v. HenriciAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Toman v. Park Castles Apartment Building Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1940
- Buttron v. RepelowiczAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
- Marcus Blackmon v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015