Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Fitch

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 4, 2004No. J00-0070; A111657Published

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Youth was taken into custody for hindering prosecution after he interfered with police efforts to apprehend a 15-year-old friend who was wanted for escape in the second degree. Youth was then searched and found to be in possession of drugs. Youth argues that, because the friend that he aided was a juvenile, not an adult, he could not be taken into custody for or found within the juvenile court’s jurisdiction on the allegation of hindering prosecution, which requires proof that the person whose prosecution was hindered committed a “crime” punishable as a felony. See ORS 162.325. Youth reasons…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of DentonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. ReynoldsOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. EwingOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. State v. LawlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. ScurlockOregon Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API