Legal Opinion

Northern States Power Co. v. South Dakota Department of Revenue

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1998No. 20319, 20324PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether a refund of contractors’ excise and use taxes under SDCL ch 10-45B, must also include interest. Because the statutes in effect at the time clearly required interest on these refunds, we conclude the circuit court ruled correctly in ordering the Department of Revenue to pay interest.

Facts

[¶ 2.] On January 3, 1992, Northern States Power (NSP) filed a New Facilities Refund Application pursuant to SDCL 10-45B-6 for its Pathfinder Combustion Turbine Generator Project. NSP was eligible to claim a refund of part or all sales,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. At & T Information Systems v. South Dakota State Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Whalen v. WhalenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Hortensia De Allende v. James Baker, Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Farmer v. South Dakota Department of Revenue & RegulationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Wuest v. Winner School District 59-2South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Foley v. State Ex Rel. South Dakota Real Estate CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Erickson v. Department of Public SafetySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Verry v. City of Belle FourcheSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API