Legal Opinion

Hogue-Kellogg Co. v. Petit

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 1920No. Civ. No. 3380PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.

The plaintiff corporation appeals from a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury for $3,984.32, upon a counterclaim set up by the defendant in a suit for the breach of certain contracts, the counterclaim being for the reasonable value of certain beans delivered by the defendant to the plaintiff under the contracts upon which the suit was brought.

On October 23, 1916, the parties entered into a written contract under which the defendant agreed to grow fifty acres of Henderson bush beans, during the farming season of 1917, on land near Encino, in this state, known as the Petit Ranch, and “to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barron v. FrinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Herzog v. PurdyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Karales v. Los Angeles Creamery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Webster Hall Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API