Legal Opinion

In Re Cater

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 2005No. 04-BG-195PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This Court recently suspended respondent Rozan E. Cater from practicing law for 180 days, with reinstatement dependent on proof of fitness and satisfaction of other conditions, as a sanction for her misconduct in four consolidated disciplinary matters. In re Cater, No. 03-BG-624, 887 A.2d 1 (D.C.2005) (Cater I). Three of those matters, which accounted for half the period of suspension, arose from respondent’s failure to respond to inquiries from Bar Counsel and orders of the Board on Professional Responsibility concerning ethical complaints that had been lodged against her.

Now before us are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. In Re BellerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re PowellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. In Re ChirstensonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API