Legal Opinion

Dierkes v. White Paving Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWicichem, J.

The principal claim of defendant is that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence either on the issue of negligence or violation of safe-place statutes, sec. 101.01 et seq., Stats. 1935. This contention requires an examination of the evidence in some detail. The accident happened at the intersection of Twenty-Seventh and Vliet streets in the city of Milwaukee. Twenty-Seventh street was under construction, and defendant had a contract for this work. The street in the vicinity of the accident had been excavated *663and as a result there was a drop of about one foot from the flange of the curb…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Klein v. BeetenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Stafford v. Chippewa Valley Electric RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Musbach v. Wisconsin Chair Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Sorenson v. Menasha Paper & Pulp Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Quass v. Milwaukee Gas Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. May v. Skelley Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Boutin v. Cardinal Theatre Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Williams v. International Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Wallow v. ZupanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Low v. SiewertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API