Legal Opinion
United States v. Ali Ahmed Hamdan and Shirley Ann Bush
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 25, 1977No. 75-3758PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Per curiam
Hamdan and Bush were convicted after a court trial of violating 8 U.S.C. § 1306(c) by making false statements in documents filed with the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Both claim that they were improperly denied a jury trial and the evidence was insufficient to support their convictions.
Hamdan is a citizen of Jordan, admitted to the United States as a nonimmigrant student. Bush is a citizen of Panama and a permanent resident alien. They were married on July 23, 1974. In August 1974 Hamdan applied for permanent resident status, alleging he resided with Bush in Foster City,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cheff v. SchnackenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Winn v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Richard W. (Dick) Rylander, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Matter of EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- United States v. Wesley G. CranerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.