Legal Opinion

Beck Ex Rel. Estate of Beck v. Haik

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 29, 2004No. 01-2723PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOGGS, Chief Judge.

The plaintiffs in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights suit appeal from the judgment entered against them after a jury verdict for the defendants. The plaintiffs challenge the correctness of several of the district court’s rulings on the admission of evidence and other trial matters, and argue that the effect of these rulings substantially prejudiced their case. Though we do not accept all of the plaintiffs’ contentions, we agree that a number of errors occurred, and that these were sufficiently prejudicial to require a new trial. We therefore reverse and remand.

I

This case…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. Luis Anthony RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beck v. HaikCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. Savel v. MetroHealth SystemDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API