Legal Opinion
Harvey v. Finnick
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 29, 1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Andrew V. Siracuse, J.
This article 78 proceeding was brought by James R. Harvey, District Attorney of the County of Ontario, to compel the County of Ontario to pay him the compensation as established by sections 183-a and 221-d of the Judiciary Law. Section 183-a of the Judiciary Law requires Ontario County to pay its District Attorney a salary equivalent to that of the County Court Judge for Ontario County.1 Under *198section 221-d of the Judiciary Law the County Court Judge’s salary is increased annually. The county has refused to pay the salary demanded by the petitioner on…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- In re the Adoption of Malpica-OrsiniNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Kittinger v. . Buffalo Traction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
- St. John v. Andrews Institute for GirlsNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- I. L. F. Y. Co. v. Temporary State Housing Rent CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harvey v. FinnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Francis v. MulhollandNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- Harvey v. FinnickNew York Supreme Court · 1982