Legal Opinion

Brockmeyer & Lykin, Inc. v. Droege

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 21, 1943No. 33,436PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

This is an action by an undertaking establishment against the-administrator of the estate of Henry Droege to recover $561 for-funeral expenses incidental to the burial of decedent. The case-comes here on appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment for defendant..

The principal questions presented are whether the evidence compels findings that there were assets in the estate from which the? funeral expenses could be paid, at least in part; whether it also compels a conclusion that the funeral arrangements were suitable to the deceased’s station in life; and whether the daughters did…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vitale v. DuerbeckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  2. Joseph S. Waterman & Sons, Inc. v. HookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Droege v. BrockmeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. In Re Estate of KirschsteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Ives, Admx. v. BeecherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schmitt v. EmerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. National Metropolitan Bank of Washington v. Joseph Gawler's Sons, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API