Legal Opinion

Paul v. Livestock State Bank

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMoBBIDE, C. J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal. The record presents a singular mixture of mistakes and omissions. The first ground is the failure to serve and file an undertaking on appeal within the time required by law. This case was decided by Judge Hewitt, April 2, 1925. On April 4th, notice of appeal was served and filed. On May 1st, an undertaking on appeal was filed, and a transcript on appeal was filed June 4, 1925. The abstract of record was filed with the clerk at Pendleton, July 16 th.

Thus it will be seen that twenty-seven days elapsed between the service of the notice of appeal and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. CoachOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Stone v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Paul v. Livestock State BankOregon Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API