Legal Opinion
In Re Vioxx Litigation
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 31, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
928 A.2d 935 (2007)
395 N.J. Super. 358
In re VIOXX LITIGATION.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 27, 2007.
Decided July 31, 2007.
Jonathan Miller argued the cause for appellants (Locks Law Firm, and Williams Cuker and Berezofsky, Cherry Hill, attorneys; Mr. Miller, James J. Pettit and Esther Berezofsky, on the brief).
Charles W. Cohen argued the cause for respondent Merck & Co., Inc. (Hughes Hubbard & Reed, Jersey City, attorneys; Mr. Cohen, of counsel and on the brief; Karl R. Thompson (O'Melveny & Myers) of the DC bar, admitted pro hac vice, and Eric Blumenfeld, on…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Nieder v. Royal Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Martinez v. E.i. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- In re Tylenol (Acetaminophen) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- FRANCES RICHBURG VS. ESTATE OF ROY RICHBURG (C-000074-15, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- Fihe v. Rexall Sundown, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- RAYMOND REBBECK VS. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. (L-4286-16, L-6318-15, L-2314-16, AND L-6817-16, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019