Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Sachs Quality Stores, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCharles A. Loreto, J.

Motion to dismiss the second amended complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient *5to constitute a cause of action. The suit is against a judgment creditor, its attorneys and a City Marshal, alleging that the creditor obtained a judgment against one with a name identical to the plaintiff’s and that the defendant, with knowledge of the fact that plaintiff was not the person against whom the judgment was obtained, wrongfully and maliciously attempted to collect the same from him by issuing a garnishee execution upon his employer, to his injury and damage.

On behalf of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark v. . WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Rogers v. . WeirNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  3. Bowe v. . WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Okyere v. Palisades Collection, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. Racoosin v. Le Schack & Grodensky, P. C.New York Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Ortiz Tejada v. Lewis DenoeTribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API