Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Washoe County

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1996No. 25066Published

1Dissent

Springer, J., with whom Steffen, C. J.,

agrees, dissenting:

The trial court, in its remand order of August 31, 1992, recognized the State Engineer’s failure to abide by NRS 533.370(3),1 which commands the State Engineer to “refuse to issue the requested permit” where “its proposed use . . . threatens to prove detrimental to the public interest.” In its remand order (hereinafter “Remand”), the trial court ruled that the State Engineer had not, in issuing the subject permits, properly considered vital public interest issues raised by the protestants and sent the matter back to the State Engineer…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Ormsby County v. KearneyNevada Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Shokal v. DunnIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Nova Horizon, Inc. v. City Council of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Mirage Casino-Hotel v. Nevada Department of Administration Appeals OfficerNevada Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API