Legal Opinion

Robin Industries, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 16, 1993No. 91-1307CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Plaintiff contends that defendant accepted a value engineering change proposal on its government contract, then refused to share the resulting savings. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1) for lack of jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for summary judgment under RCFC 56. The parties have briefed the matter, and oral argument is deemed unnecessary. For the reasons that follow, the court concludes that it has jurisdiction over at least part of the claim, but that defendant is entitled to summary judgment.

I. Background 1

The Defense Industrial…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. YRT Services Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. RCS Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API