Legal Opinion

Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. McCallum

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 19, 2002No. 02-1204PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeininger, J.

¶ 1. Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc., appeals an order dismissing its complaint against Governor McCallum for failure to join an indispensable party. Dairyland's action seeks to enjoin the Governor from renewing the state's gaming compacts with Indian tribes having reservations or other land in Wisconsin. The circuit court concluded that the tribes are "necessary parties" to the litigation under Wis. Stat. § 803.03(1) (1999-2000), 1 and because the tribes cannot be joined as parties, that Dairyland's action should be dismissed pursuant to § 803.03(3). We conclude that the circuit court erred…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Makah Indian Tribe v. C. William VerityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Sac & Fox Nation of Missouri v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  4. Wichita and Affiliated Tribes of Oklahoma v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary, Department of Interior Wichita and Affiliated Tribes of Oklahoma v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary, Department of Interior Appeal of Caddo Tribe of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  5. State Ex Rel. Clark v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. DoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Panzer v. DoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Automotive United Trades Organization v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API