Watkins v. Wilhoit
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, San Joaquin County; Ansel Smith, Judge. Action in the nature of a creditors’ bill by C. G. Watkins against R E. Wilhoit, B. F. Langford and M. E. Bryant. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
VANCLIEF, C.
This action is of the nature of a creditors’ bill in equity to subject property in the hands or under the control of the defendants Wilhoit and Langford to the payment of a judgment at law against defendant Bryant in favor of the plaintiff. A demurrer to the complaint having been sustained,' and plaintiff having declined to amend his complaint, judgment passed for defendants. The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment upon the judgment-roll containing a bill of exceptions showing that the demurrer was sustained on the grounds ‘‘ that the complaint does not state facts sufficient…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Baines v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Taylor v. BowkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Sawyer v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1836
- Pearsoll v. ChapinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
- Harmon v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ziska v. ZiskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Williams v. Commercial National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Blackwell v. HatchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Weil v. DefenbachIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
- McKenzie County v. CasadyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.