Legal Opinion

Gray v. Mullins

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1910No. Civ. No. 931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPLICATION for writ of mandamus to the Board of Supervisors of Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT. (Per COOPER, P. J.)

This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondents, constituting the board of supervisors of the county of Alameda, to issue to the petitioner a certificate of election, it being claimed that he was duly elected a justice of the peace of the township of Oakland, county of Alameda, at the general election held on the eighth day of November, 1910.

It is hardly necessary to repeat what we have many times said, that the writ of mandate is a prerogative writ, and in order to entitle the petitioner to such writ it must plainly appear that he is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. W. R. Grace & Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Doolittle v. EckertIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Almon v. McEvoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. W. R. Grace & Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API