Legal Opinion

Eisenbach v. Schneider

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 10, 2007No. 58047-7-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*645¶1

Cox, J.

Federal law controls the determination of the obligation to pay and the total amount of federal estate tax.1 However, state law generally retains its traditional role of determining testamentary intent respecting the impact of the estate tax on beneficiaries and distribution of the estate.2 Here, the settlors of the trust indenture at issue in this case clearly intended that the burden of paid estate taxes should be allocated pro rata between two funds described in the trust indenture. Neither the statutory right of recovery provision under the Internal Revenue Code3 nor other law…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Riggs v. Del DragoSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. In Re Disciplinary Proc. Against LongacreWashington Supreme Court · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sources for Sustainable Communities v. Building Industry Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. ESTATE OF McLEMORE v. McLemoreMississippi Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Matter of TownsonSurrogate's Court, Monroe County · 2025
  4. Matter of TownsonSurrogate's Court, Monroe County · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API