State, Department of Revenue v. Cowgill
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
1. INTRODUCTION
The State of Alaska appeals from the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board’s award of attorney’s fees to the claimant, Pat Cowgill. The state argues that the amount of the award was unreasonable, that the board failed to make adequate findings, and that it abused its discretion. The state also requests that we revisit our previous cases dealing with the board’s application of the “contingency factor” in awarding fees.
We conclude that the fee award was not manifestly unreasonable, that the board made adequate findings, and that it did not abuse its…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wien Air Alaska v. ArantAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Williams v. AboodAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Wise Mechanical Contractors v. BignellAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Stephens v. ITT/Felec ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Bolieu v. Our Lady of Compassion Care CenterAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State, Division of Workers' Compensation v. Titan Enterprises, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Cooper v. ThompsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Warnke-Green v. Pro-West Contractors, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Sandra J. Rusch v. Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium and Alaska National Insurance Company, Brenda Dockter v. SEARHC and Alaska National Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Sandra Rusch and Barbara Dockter v. Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium and Alaska National Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.